Metro

Ex-President Lungu’s daughter has no known source of income— Zambian Govt

Published

2 weeks ago

April 15, 2024

The Zambian Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Gilbert Phiri, has contended that ex-President Edgar Lungu’s daughter, Tasila, has no known source of income that would warrant her display of wealth which included the purchase of a farm in Sinda district.

Phiri had last year filed an application before the Economic and Financial Crimes Court, High Court division, to forfeit to the State the farm with an estimated value of K13 million.

But in her objection to the order, Tasila had challenged the State to prove her guilty of criminally acquiring the farm which she said was purchased with financial assistance from her father.

She described the investigations against her by the agencies including the Drug Enforcement Commission (DEC), as “deliberate, intentional and malicious” following the change of government after the 2021 presidential elections.

The DPP, while testifying in the alleged corruption case against Tasila, argued that her mere mention of her father as having financially assisted her to purchase the farm is not proof enough to conclude that the property was acquired and developed using legitimate funds.

The State’s evidence which was contained in an affidavit in reply to Tasila’s claims in opposition, also demanded for her to provide documentation depicting the movement of funds from the former President to herself.

Meanwhile, the DEC senior investigations officer, Emmanuel Khondwe, who also testified in the celebrated case, noted that there was cogent evidence that suggested that the property was reasonably suspected to be proceeds of crime, thus, should be forfeited to the State.

Khondwe stated that according to investigations carried out by the agency. Tasila had no known income prior to the period June 11, 2015, to August 31, 2021.

In its affidavit, the DEC contended “that it is crucial for the interested party to provide clear documentation demonstrating the interested party’s father’s involvement and assistance in acquiring and developing the property, along with evidence of his financial contribution.

“That additionally, thorough disclosure of the interested party’s father’s financial sources is necessary to ascertain the legality of the funds so gifted to the interested party which were utilized to acquire and develop the property in question.

“That this information is crucial for the court to make well informed decisions regarding the legality of the funds and the status of the property under scrutiny.”

Khondwe, however, responded that the forfeiture proceedings against the property were not malicious but allegations true, founded and supported by compelling evidence.

“The interested party must demonstrate, in explicit detail, the origin and timelines showing when she came into possession of the funds utilized for the acquisition and development of the property,” he stated.

The State has also denied infringement of Tasila’s constitutional right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty with Khondwe arguing that the forfeiture proceedings were not directed at her but rather at the property itself.

Click to comment

Metro

Conservationist, Kearns, names intolerance and digital media abuse as threats to media freedom

Published

11 hours ago

April 29, 2024

Akanimoh Etim

Nsama Kearns, the Executive Director of Care for Nature, speaks on the indispensable role of a free media in society.

In a conversation with Zambia Monitor in Mansa, Luapula Province, Kearns underscored the importance of media freedoms, digital rights, and freedom of speech in enhancing good governance.

“Let me begin with the criticality of media freedom, especially for those of us involved in information dissemination through mass media, including social media,” she remarked.

While acknowledging the existence of media freedoms in Zambia, Kearns expressed concerns about the prevailing situation.

“Despite media freedoms in Zambia, as reported in the 2022 human rights report, there are instances where the government may display intolerance towards criticism, especially if perceived as politically motivated,” she observed.

Regarding freedom of speech, Kearns emphasized the necessity for individuals to express themselves without fear of reprisal.

“Whether communicating through written or oral means, individuals should be able to express themselves freely without intimidation or fear of repercussions,” she stressed.

Kearns highlighted the significance of freedom of expression in enabling civil society to address issues that might be inconvenient for the government.

“For instance, in Luapula Province, longstanding issues such as illegal mining and the Mukula tree trade, involving politically exposed persons, have been challenging to address,” she explained.

Despite challenges, Kearns noted the positive impact of digital media in driving social enterprise.

However, she also highlighted the prevalence of abuse, particularly targeting women, on social media platforms.

“While digital media presents opportunities for social entrepreneurship, individuals, especially women, often face abuse online, hindering their enjoyment of human rights,” Kearns lamented.

She called for the creation of safe spaces to empower individuals to report abuse to the Zambia Information Communication Authority (ZICTA) and address issues of digital media abuse and intolerance effectively.

This story is sponsored content from Zambia Monitor’s Project Aliyense.

Metro

I saved Nigeria from bankruptcy by removing fuel subsidy— Tinubu

Published

16 hours ago

April 29, 2024

Akanimoh Etim

Nigerian President, Bola Tinubu, on Sunday, boasted that he saved Nigeria from going bankrupt by removing fuel subsidy on his first day in office.

Tinubu had, in his inaugural speech on May 29, 2023, pronounced that his administration would discontinue fuel subsidy payments and though the ripple effect of the removal has brought untold hardship and hunger, the President has continued to praise his courage in taking that decisive action.

Tinubu who spoke at the Special World Economic Forum in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on Sunday, admitted that though the policy came with economic pains, it was in the best interest of Nigerians, affirming that the move has save the government money for infrastructural expansion.

While addressing his audience, Tinubu argued that removing the petrol subsidy was a necessary action for Nigeria not to go bankrupt and to reset the economy towards growth.

Tinubu said that the petrol subsidy removal equally engendered accountability, transparency and physical discipline for the country.

“Concerning the question of the subsidy removal, there is no doubt that it was a necessary action for my country not to go bankrupt, to reset the economy and pathway to growth,” Tinubu said.

“Yes, there have been drawbacks. Yes, there was the expectation that a greater number of people would feel the difficulty, but, of course, I believed it was their interest that was the focus of government.

“It is easier to manage and explain the difficulties, but along the line, there was a parallel arrangement to cushion the effect of the subsidy removal on the vulnerable population of the country.

“We shared the pain across the board. We cannot but include those who are very vulnerable. Luckily, we have a very vibrant youthful population interested in discoveries by themselves, highly ready for technology, good education, and committed to growth,” Tinubu explained.