The presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC) in Nigeria’s 2023 presidential election, Omoyele Sowore, has vowed that despite his arrest by operatives of the Nigerian Immigration Service (NIS) on arrival from the United States at the Murtala Mohammed International Airport in Lagos on Sunday, the President Bola Tinubu-led government should expect more protests.

Sowore, the convener of #RevolutionNow, who was reportedly arrested and detained on Sunday morning at the airport by the NIS which also seized his passport and other travelling documents, said he was not afraid of Tinubu and would go ahead with planned protests.

Sowore, who is also a journalist and publisher of online news platform, Sahara Reporters, had on Sunday announced his arrest on X.com.

“I had just arrived in Nigeria from the USA at MMIA in Lagos; upon reaching Nigerian Immigration, my passport was seized, and they told me they had orders to detain me.

“This is not unexpected because I have always known that it is part of the broader clampdown by the fascist @officialAbat regime on dissent and their fear of the upcoming #FearlessINOctober revolt.”

Though he was later released after undergoing interrogation, Sowore was still upbeat about going ahead with planned protests against the government as he is not afraid of President Tinubu.

Sowore who later appeared in an interview programme on a popular TV station on Sunday night by, insisted that a planned “FearlessInOctober” protest scheduled to commence on October 1, will still go on as well as other such demonstrations.

He said the protest was part of a series of protests organised by Nigerians against what he called the oppressive government of Tinubu.

“We started on August 1, which was part of the ‘End Bad Governance’ protest. It was supposed to be a continuation,” he said.

“There were 15 demands that the government did not even attend to. Instead of that, the Federal Government arrested and detained a lot of people. They tied them with bogus offences, very outrageous offences of treason – for carrying placards.

“So, this is going to be a continuation of that.

“Everybody is aware, the government is aware of this. Everybody is looking forward to it because it’s a matter of right that Nigerians have to not allow this government to obliterate them with hunger, starvation, and incompetence

“It is treason to arrest, detain, and forcibly charge citizens with crimes that the government committed. And it’s not the first time I was accused of treason. In fact, I heard about the offence of treason in 1992 at the University of Lagos when we went and did Babangida Must Go.

“And the police arrested us at Western Avenue Police Station, asked us to start writing statements under duress, and said that we wanted to overthrow the government. That was the period that Olusegun Mayegun was President of NANS.

“I was charged with treason in 2019 by Buhari, so I’m not new to these bogus offences of treason. But that is not our focus. Our focus is that we have a country to liberate and a people to save. So whatever offences are thrown our way, we should not be discouraged.

“It’s up to the people to determine what constitutes the offence of treason. And I must say to you also that in 1994, Tinubu was accused of treason. If you remember when he was accused of bombing the Ejigbo depot by Abacha. So that was why he left Nigeria on exile. But in our case, we are not going to go on exile simply because the government is afraid of our package,” Sowore added.

Now at 60, Zambia has made significant strides toward achieving a free society where citizens can picket and express their opinions without fear of reprisal.

Despite numerous milestones, such as the repeal of the defamation of the President and the enactment of the Access to Information Act, significant challenges to freedom of expression persist.

Recent developments reflect Zambia’s ongoing struggle.

The Access to Information Act promises to enhance public access to information, promote transparency, and foster greater participation in governance.

However, issues remain, including the continued use of restrictive laws and practices that threaten freedom of speech.

Amnesty International Zambia’s recent snapshot highlights notable progress, such as efforts to amend the Public Order Act (POA).

The Zambia Law Development Commission (ZLDC) has reviewed the POA and proposed the Public Gathering Bill to replace it.

This bill aimed to address the long-standing misuse of the POA to curtailed freedom of expression, assembly, and association, particularly affecting civil society and opposition parties.

In an insightful scholarly article, Katherine (Hyun-Joo) Mooney, a PhD candidate at Ohio State University, underscores the need for Zambia to make more meaningful concessions regarding free speech.

Mooney noted that President Hakainde Hichilema’s 2022 repeal of the death penalty and the law against publicly defaming the president marked significant progress.

Under Section 69 of the Penal Code, which had been in place since 1965, Zambians could be imprisoned for up to three years for ridiculing the president.

Mooney acknowledged this as a step forward but highlights that media control remains a challenge.

She traced the roots of media control back to Kenneth Kaunda’s regime, which used the media to support his one-party state and Humanist policies.

Kaunda’s administration controlled newspapers and broadcasting services by staffing them with individuals who would publish favorable content.

This approach ensured that government perspectives were predominant, even in the face of criticism.

Despite the return to multi-party politics in 1991, the Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (MMD) failed to liberate the media as promised, continuing to exert executive power over the press.

This persistent control eroded public trust in the media and state institutions, leading to further resistance and repression.

Mooney emphasizes that Zambia’s current administration must address these issues, especially in the digital age.

The 2021 protests against the Cyber Security and Cyber Crimes Act illustrate ongoing concerns about restrictive measures that could undermine freedom of expression.

“The Hichilema administration needs to take heed; otherwise, Zambians will continue to fight tooth and nail for their freedom of expression,” Mooney warned.

She called for the end of the cycle of restrictive laws and violent suppression, a struggle that has persisted since the Kaunda era.

As Zambia continued to navigate these complex issues, the quest for greater speech rights remains a pivotal challenge.

The nation’s progress would depend on its ability to reconcile past practices with the demands of a more open and democratic society.

This story is sponsored by Project Aliyense.