The president of one of Zambia’s opposition parties, New Era Democratic (NED), Pumulo Situmbeko, has accused President Hakainde Hichilema of being manipulative and authoritarian, following the recent suspension of three Constitutional Court judges.
Situmbeko, who bared her mind in an interview with Zambia Monitor, described the action of the president as a direct attack on democracy.
Situmbeko noted that the judges had presided over former President Edgar Lungu’s 2021 eligibility case, and questioned the timing and motivations behind their suspension by Hichilema, saying the president’s action raised significant concerns about conflict of interest and authoritarianism as the case directly involved him.
“For a sitting president to dismiss or appoint judges in a matter that involves him personally is not only a profound abuse of power but also a breach of professional ethics and integrity,” the NED leader said.
She however, warned that the move compromised the judiciary’s independence and eroded public trust in the justice system, emphasizing that by suspending the judges involved in a case concerning the president, there was a risk that remaining or newly appointed judges could be influenced or intimidated into making biased rulings.
“This manipulation of the judiciary to serve the president’s interests threatens the very foundation of impartial justice, which is critical to democracy,” Situmbeko stated.
She also raised concerns about Joseph Busengwa, the individual who requested the judges’ suspension, pointing out his close personal relationship with the president, as evidenced on social media which calls into question the motivations behind the suspensions and the possible influence of external actors on judicial decisions.
“The involvement of an individual closely connected to the president, with a questionable background, in this process is deeply troubling,” Situmbeko said.
Situmbeko highlighted that Lungu’s eligibility case had been heard multiple times, with no new compelling evidence presented to warrant reopening it.
“This is not only a waste of judicial resources but a deliberate attempt to manipulate the outcome of a previously settled matter,” she concluded.